I'm about to possibly sound
highly shallow and horrible, but
this article really kind of annoys me. I'm
all for blogging about fashion worn by normal people, but
honestly, the thing about models is that they're supposed to be versatile enough to pull off a look reminiscent of whatever (street fashion, I guess, in this case), while
showcasing the clothes that they're supposed to be showcasing and
looking above average doing it.
Maybe I'm getting the idea entirely wrong somewhere in there, but I know that I
don't flip through Vogue and Elle to look at catwalk models that look like people I could see
walking around my school. If I wanted to see real people, I'd go outside every once in a while.
I'm
all for a plus size/real size/whatever size modeling industry breakthrough. I'm
not advocating eating disorders (sorry, Janice Dickinson), and I totally
support those
European runways that banned models who were too skinny. I think that's great. I like it when people don't
die. But that doesn't mean just anyone can stomp the runway.
Unfair? Shut up. I can't do it, either, and you don't hear me complaining. Well, obviously you DO, but not about that.
Point: If you can make plus sized and real sized models work, more power to you, my fabulous young friend. But they still
gotta be pretty. Or...
couture, anyway, which I guess you wouldn't necessarily call pretty. (I was going to link a picture there, but it would have been mean. Moreso than I'm willing to be at this time, anyway.) (And I can't find any stills of Madame Carparts walking down the catwalk in a Dora bob. Probably because she hasn't. Also she's not couture. I'm so bitter!)
Labels: models, shallow